Pilgrims Pride vs Smithfield Foods
PPC and SFD side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PPC and SFD compare
Pilgrims Pride and Smithfield Foods are about the same size, with market caps of $6.7B and $7.5B.
On earnings, Smithfield Foods is cheaper: it trades at 8.4× trailing earnings, against 20.9× for Pilgrims Pride.
Pilgrims Pride grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−0.12% versus −0.60% for Smithfield Foods).
Smithfield Foods keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.9% compared with 1.7% at Pilgrims Pride.
Smithfield Foods pays a dividend yielding 7.8%; Pilgrims Pride does not pay one.
Smithfield Foods scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 9 for Pilgrims Pride), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PPC | SFD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.7B | $7.5B |
| Share price | $28.21 | $19.14 |
| Change, 1 year | −24.8% | −12.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −1.4% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.35 | 0.21 |
| Employees | 63K | 32K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.9× | 8.4× (better) |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 0.5× |
| P/B | 1.7× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.3× | 5.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 14.4× | 8.1× (better) |
| PEG | 1.54 (better) | 2.70 |
| FCF yield | 6.9% | 12.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $33.89 | $42.84 |
| Margin of safety | 16.8% | 55.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.12% (better) | −0.60% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.9% (better) | 3.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −74.0% | 4.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −73.8% | 2.7% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 63.4% | 1429% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 7.9% | 12.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.4% | 7.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.7% | 5.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.5% | 6.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 8.6% | 13.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.6% | 11.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.88 | 0.29 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.22 | 0.56 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 3.9× | 38.3× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.55 | 2.39 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.93 | 3.19 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 7.8% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 7.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 20.6% | 13.8% |
| Held by insiders | 82.3% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$303K (better) | −$4.4M |
| Short interest, % of float | 13.8% | – |
Go deeper
- PPC stock overview
- PPC income statement
- PPC valuation and score
- SFD stock overview
- SFD income statement
- SFD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.