Hormel Foods vs Smithfield Foods
HRL and SFD side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HRL and SFD compare
Hormel Foods is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Smithfield Foods ($12.2B against $7.6B).
On earnings, Smithfield Foods is cheaper: it trades at 8.4× trailing earnings, against 35.1× for Hormel Foods.
Hormel Foods grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.73% versus −0.60% for Smithfield Foods).
Smithfield Foods keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.9% compared with 2.8% at Hormel Foods.
Both pay dividends: Hormel Foods yields 5.3% and Smithfield Foods 6.5%.
Smithfield Foods scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 13 for Hormel Foods), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HRL | SFD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $12.2B | $7.6B |
| Share price | $22.09 | $19.19 |
| Change, 1 year | −0.81% | −12.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −48.2% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.19 | 0.21 |
| Employees | 20K | 32K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 35.1× | 8.4× (better) |
| P/S | 1.0× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 1.5× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.7× | 5.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 15.6× | 8.2× (better) |
| PEG | – | 2.71 |
| FCF yield | 6.4% | 12.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $18.08 | $42.63 |
| Margin of safety | −22.2% | 55.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.73% (better) | −0.60% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.7% (better) | 3.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −54.6% | 4.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −54.0% | 2.7% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −12.1% | 1429% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 15.7% (better) | 12.6% |
| Operating margin | 4.7% | 7.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.8% | 5.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | 6.4% (better) | 6.1% |
| Return on equity | 4.3% | 13.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 3.7% | 11.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.36 | 0.29 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.35 | 0.56 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 7.3× | 38.3× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.88 | 2.39 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.33 (better) | 3.20 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.3% | 6.5% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 187% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 4.5% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.3% | 6.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 43.8% | 13.8% |
| Held by insiders | 0.54% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$616K (better) | −$4.4M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.2% | – |
Go deeper
- HRL stock overview
- HRL income statement
- HRL valuation and score
- SFD stock overview
- SFD income statement
- SFD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.