Pilgrims Pride vs Smithfield Foods
PPC and SFD side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PPC and SFD compare
Pilgrims Pride and Smithfield Foods are about the same size, with market caps of $6.8B and $7.2B.
On earnings, Smithfield Foods is cheaper: it trades at 6.8× trailing earnings, against 21.3× for Pilgrims Pride.
Smithfield Foods grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.3% versus −0.12% for Pilgrims Pride).
Smithfield Foods keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.8% compared with 1.7% at Pilgrims Pride.
Smithfield Foods pays a dividend yielding 6.5%; Pilgrims Pride does not pay one.
Smithfield Foods scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 8 for Pilgrims Pride), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PPC | SFD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.8B | $7.2B |
| Share price | $28.72 | $18.34 |
| Change, 1 year | −24.7% | −15.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 2.4% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.36 | 0.25 |
| Employees | 63K | 32K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 20 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 21.3× | 6.8× (better) |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 0.5× |
| P/B | 1.8× | 1.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.4× | 4.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 14.7× | 8.9× (better) |
| PEG | 1.57 (better) | 2.20 |
| FCF yield | 6.8% | 11.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $33.64 | $47.97 |
| Margin of safety | 14.6% | 61.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.12% | 4.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.9% (better) | 3.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −74.0% | 16.8% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −73.8% | 13.6% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 63.4% | 1429% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 7.9% | 13.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.4% | 8.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.7% | 6.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.5% | 5.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 8.6% | 15.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.6% | 13.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.88 | 0.29 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.22 | 0.39 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 3.9× | 38.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.55 | 2.56 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.94 | 3.29 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 6.5% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 6.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 20.6% | 13.8% |
| Held by insiders | 82.3% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$303K (better) | −$4.4M |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.4% | – |
Go deeper
- PPC stock overview
- PPC income statement
- PPC valuation and score
- SFD stock overview
- SFD income statement
- SFD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.