Phillips Edison & vs Regency Centers
PECO and REG side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PECO and REG compare
Regency Centers is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as Phillips Edison & ($13.9B against $5.3B).
Regency Centers grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.2% versus 7.0% for Phillips Edison &).
Regency Centers keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 34.4% compared with 23.9% at Phillips Edison &.
Both pay dividends: Phillips Edison & yields 3.2% and Regency Centers 4.0%.
Regency Centers scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 14 for Phillips Edison &), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PECO | REG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.3B | $13.9B |
| Share price | $41.19 | $76.11 |
| Change, 1 year | 18.7% | 8.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 23.9% | 3.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.41 | 0.66 |
| Employees | 320 | 507 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 29.4× | – |
| P/S | 7.0× (better) | 8.6× |
| P/B | 2.2× | 2.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 8.8× |
| PEG | 1.03 | – |
| Fair value | $51.02 | $69.18 |
| Margin of safety | 19.3% (better) | −10.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.0% | 8.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.8% | 8.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 122% (better) | 37.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 119% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 77.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 72.0% |
| Net margin | 23.9% | 34.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 7.8% | 8.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 13.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.91 | 1.82 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.2% | 4.0% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 91.5% | 95.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 | 12 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 16.3% (better) | 3.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.2% | 4.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 89.2% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 0.67% | 0.52% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$39.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.5% | – |
Go deeper
- PECO stock overview
- PECO income statement
- PECO valuation and score
- REG stock overview
- REG income statement
- REG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.