Brixmor Property vs Regency Centers
BRX and REG side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BRX and REG compare
Regency Centers is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as Brixmor Property ($13.9B against $9.3B).
Regency Centers grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.2% versus 5.7% for Brixmor Property).
Regency Centers keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 34.4% compared with 30.0% at Brixmor Property.
Both pay dividends: Brixmor Property yields 4.1% and Regency Centers 4.0%.
Regency Centers scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 9 for Brixmor Property), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BRX | REG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $9.3B | $13.9B |
| Share price | $30.23 | $75.74 |
| Change, 1 year | 11.6% | 6.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 23.0% | 2.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.80 | 0.66 |
| Employees | 464 | 507 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 21.9× | – |
| P/S | 6.5× (better) | 8.6× |
| P/B | 3.1× | 2.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 8.8× |
| PEG | 9.83 | – |
| Fair value | $29.14 | $69.80 |
| Margin of safety | −3.7% (better) | −8.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.7% | 8.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.4% | 8.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 28.2% | 37.8% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 26.6% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 25.0% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 72.0% |
| Net margin | 30.0% | 34.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 14.2% (better) | 8.2% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 13.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.09 | 1.81 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.1% (better) | 4.0% |
| Payout ratio | – | 95.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 | 12 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 18.5% (better) | 3.8% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.1% (better) | 4.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 0.82% | 0.52% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$500K (better) | −$39.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.3% | – |
Go deeper
- BRX stock overview
- BRX income statement
- BRX valuation and score
- REG stock overview
- REG income statement
- REG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.