Federal Realty Investment Trust vs Regency Centers
FRT and REG side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FRT and REG compare
Regency Centers is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Federal Realty Investment Trust ($13.9B against $9.7B).
Regency Centers grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.2% versus 7.8% for Federal Realty Investment Trust).
Regency Centers keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 34.4% compared with 32.6% at Federal Realty Investment Trust.
Both pay dividends: Federal Realty Investment Trust yields 4.0% and Regency Centers 4.0%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FRT | REG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $9.7B | $13.9B |
| Share price | $112.92 | $76.11 |
| Change, 1 year | 15.6% | 8.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −12.4% | 3.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.74 | 0.66 |
| Employees | 314 | 507 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 | 15 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 | 5 |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 22.7× | – |
| P/S | 7.2× (better) | 8.6× |
| P/B | 3.0× | 2.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.3× | 8.8× (better) |
| Fair value | $114.24 | $69.18 |
| Margin of safety | 1.2% (better) | −10.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.8% | 8.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.9% (better) | 8.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 27.1% | 37.8% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 26.1% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 23.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 47.7% | 72.0% (better) |
| Net margin | 32.6% | 34.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 13.6% (better) | 8.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 16.4% (better) | 13.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 3.3× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.43 | 1.82 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.0% (better) | 4.0% |
| Payout ratio | – | 95.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 13 (better) | 12 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 1.0% | 3.8% (better) |
| Buyback yield | −0.62% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.4% | 4.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.4% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 0.94% | 0.52% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$163K (better) | −$39.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.5% | – |
Go deeper
- FRT stock overview
- FRT income statement
- FRT valuation and score
- REG stock overview
- REG income statement
- REG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.