Macerich vs Regency Centers
MAC and REG side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MAC and REG compare
Regency Centers is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Macerich ($14.0B against $7.2B).
Regency Centers grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.2% versus −1.3% for Macerich).
Regency Centers keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 34.4% compared with −9.8% at Macerich.
Both pay dividends: Macerich yields 2.7% and Regency Centers 4.0%.
Regency Centers scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 6 for Macerich), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MAC | REG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.2B | $14.0B |
| Share price | $25.38 | $76.18 |
| Change, 1 year | 41.9% | 8.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 20.1% | 3.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.31 | 0.66 |
| Employees | 598 | 507 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 7.1× (better) | 8.6× |
| P/B | 2.6× | 2.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 8.8× |
| Fair value | $11.73 | $70.22 |
| Margin of safety | −116% | −8.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.3% | 8.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.2% | 8.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 37.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 72.0% |
| Net margin | −9.8% | 34.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | −3.8% | 8.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 13.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.20 | 1.82 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.7% | 4.0% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 95.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 12 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −15.2% | 3.8% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 2.7% | 4.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 110% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 0.38% | 0.52% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$63.8K (better) | −$39.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.9% | – |
Go deeper
- MAC stock overview
- MAC income statement
- MAC valuation and score
- REG stock overview
- REG income statement
- REG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.