Oshkosh vs Thor Industries
OSK and THO side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OSK and THO compare
Oshkosh is the larger company, worth 2.2 times as much as Thor Industries ($8.6B against $4.0B).
Oshkosh grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.2% versus 0.30% for Thor Industries).
Both pay dividends: Oshkosh yields 1.6% and Thor Industries 2.0%.
Oshkosh scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 10 for Thor Industries), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OSK | THO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.6B | $4.0B |
| Share price | $141.78 | $77.04 |
| Change, 1 year | 13.3% | −24.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 26.1% | −30.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.05 | 1.22 |
| Employees | 18K | 20K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 22.8× |
| P/S | 0.8× | 0.4× (better) |
| P/B | 1.9× | 0.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.4× | 7.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 8.9× | – |
| FCF yield | 11.3% | – |
| Fair value | $111.52 | $70.52 |
| Margin of safety | −27.1% | −9.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.2% (better) | 0.30% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.5% (better) | −4.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −31.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −30.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −22.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 15.4% (better) | 12.6% |
| Operating margin | 6.8% | – |
| Net margin | – | 1.8% |
| FCF margin | 9.0% | – |
| Return on equity | – | 4.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 10.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.24 | 0.20 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.56 (better) | 0.70 |
| Current ratio | 1.72 | 1.77 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.16 | 3.37 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.6% | 2.0% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | 11 (better) | 9 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 13.6% (better) | 4.9% |
| Buyback yield | 3.9% (better) | 2.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.5% (better) | 4.9% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 107% |
| Held by insiders | 0.80% | 14.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.0M | −$473K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.6% | 10.9% |
Go deeper
- OSK stock overview
- OSK income statement
- OSK valuation and score
- THO stock overview
- THO income statement
- THO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.