Federal Signal vs Oshkosh
FSS and OSK side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FSS and OSK compare
Oshkosh is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Federal Signal ($8.6B against $7.0B).
Federal Signal grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.0% versus 4.2% for Oshkosh).
Both pay dividends: Federal Signal yields 0.51% and Oshkosh 1.6%.
Federal Signal scores higher on the StockData Score (23 against 11 for Oshkosh), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FSS | OSK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.0B | $8.6B |
| Share price | $115.06 | $140.40 |
| Change, 1 year | 4.1% | 12.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 153% | 24.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 1.04 |
| Employees | 5,800 | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 23 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.9× | – |
| P/S | 2.8× | 0.8× (better) |
| P/B | 4.4× | 1.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.5× | 9.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 19.2× | 8.8× (better) |
| PEG | 0.89 | – |
| FCF yield | 5.2% | 11.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $92.06 | $112.34 |
| Margin of safety | −25.0% | −25.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 24.0% (better) | 4.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.0% (better) | 4.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 25.9% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 25.8% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 20.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 29.1% (better) | 15.4% |
| Operating margin | 16.2% (better) | 6.8% |
| Net margin | 11.7% | – |
| FCF margin | 14.3% (better) | 9.0% |
| Return on equity | 20.5% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 18.6% (better) | 10.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.27 | 0.24 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.68 | 0.56 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 17.9× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.97 (better) | 1.72 |
| Altman Z-score | 7.55 (better) | 3.16 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | 1.6% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 12.1% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | 11 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 11.8% | 13.6% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.07% | 4.0% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.59% | 5.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 102% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 2.5% | 0.80% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.1M | −$1.0M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.1% | 3.6% |
Go deeper
- FSS stock overview
- FSS income statement
- FSS valuation and score
- OSK stock overview
- OSK income statement
- OSK valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.