Matador Resources vs Permian Resources
MTDR and PR side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MTDR and PR compare
Permian Resources is the larger company, worth 2.9 times as much as Matador Resources ($18.7B against $6.4B).
On earnings, Matador Resources is cheaper: it trades at 9.0× trailing earnings, against 11.6× for Permian Resources.
Permian Resources grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (22.8% versus 1.3% for Matador Resources).
Permian Resources keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 25.0% compared with 18.6% at Matador Resources.
Both pay dividends: Matador Resources yields 2.2% and Permian Resources 2.8%.
Matador Resources scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 11 for Permian Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MTDR | PR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.4B | $18.7B |
| Share price | $52.08 | $22.32 |
| Change, 1 year | 31.6% | 68.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 27.8% | 236% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.89 | 0.78 |
| Employees | 483 | 515 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 9.0× (better) | 11.6× |
| P/S | 1.7× (better) | 2.9× |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 1.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.0× (better) | 8.5× |
| Fair value | $72.17 | $21.89 |
| Margin of safety | 27.8% (better) | −2.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.3% | 22.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 33.8% | 54.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −7.9% | 96.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −7.2% | 76.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 31.6% | 40.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 18.6% | 25.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 12.5% | 14.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 16.7% (better) | 14.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.11 (better) | 0.25 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.26 (better) | 1.16 |
| Interest coverage | 4.9× | 10.3× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.55 (better) | 0.50 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.26 | 2.53 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.2% | 2.8% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 25.8% | 33.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Buyback yield | 0.46% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.6% | 2.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.1% | 91.3% |
| Held by insiders | 1.6% | 7.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $2.6M (better) | −$90.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.6% | 3.8% |
Go deeper
- MTDR stock overview
- MTDR income statement
- MTDR valuation and score
- PR stock overview
- PR income statement
- PR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.