Microchip Technology vs Qnity Electronics
MCHP and Q side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MCHP and Q compare
Microchip Technology is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Qnity Electronics ($33.5B against $24.8B).
On earnings, Qnity Electronics is cheaper: it trades at 44.7× trailing earnings, against 46.7× for Microchip Technology.
Microchip Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (33.0% versus 17.7% for Qnity Electronics).
Both pay dividends: Microchip Technology yields 3.0% and Qnity Electronics 0.25%.
Microchip Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 7 for Qnity Electronics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MCHP | Q |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $33.5B | $24.8B |
| Share price | $61.68 | $118.36 |
| Change, 1 year | 10.9% | 28.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −25.4% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.71 | 1.49 |
| Employees | 18K | 10K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 46.7× | 44.7× (better) |
| P/S | 6.0× | 4.5× (better) |
| P/B | 5.0× | 3.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 21.1× (better) | 22.5× |
| P/FCF | 23.0× (better) | 31.9× |
| FCF yield | 4.3% (better) | 3.1% |
| Fair value | $43.98 | $100.97 |
| Margin of safety | −40.2% | −17.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 33.0% (better) | 17.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −2.8% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −19.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 62.7% (better) | 46.9% |
| Operating margin | 20.9% | – |
| Net margin | 15.0% | – |
| FCF margin | 26.0% (better) | 14.2% |
| Return on equity | 12.6% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 8.6% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.83 | 0.53 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.77 | 2.33 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 5.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.24 (better) | 2.09 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.75 (better) | 2.73 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.0% (better) | 0.25% |
| Payout ratio | 118% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 17 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 19.5% | – |
| Buyback yield | −0.19% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.8% (better) | 0.25% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 100% | 77.5% |
| Held by insiders | 2.0% | 0.17% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$70.9M | −$645K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 2.1% |
Go deeper
- MCHP stock overview
- MCHP income statement
- MCHP valuation and score
- Q stock overview
- Q income statement
- Q valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.