ON Semiconductor vs Qnity Electronics
ON and Q side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ON and Q compare
ON Semiconductor and Qnity Electronics are about the same size, with market caps of $28.7B and $25.7B.
On earnings, ON Semiconductor is cheaper: it trades at 42.9× trailing earnings, against 46.3× for Qnity Electronics.
Qnity Electronics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.7% versus 2.9% for ON Semiconductor).
Qnity Electronics pays a dividend yielding 0.24%; ON Semiconductor does not pay one.
ON Semiconductor scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for Qnity Electronics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ON | Q |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $28.7B | $25.7B |
| Share price | $73.73 | $122.69 |
| Change, 1 year | 52.2% | 27.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 16.4% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.63 | 1.52 |
| Employees | 26K | 10K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 42.9× (better) | 46.3× |
| P/S | 4.5× (better) | 4.7× |
| P/B | 3.8× | 3.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.5× (better) | 23.2× |
| P/FCF | 17.8× (better) | 33.0× |
| FCF yield | 5.6% (better) | 3.0% |
| Fair value | $54.08 | $103.89 |
| Margin of safety | −36.3% | −18.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.9% | 17.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.7% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 116% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 123% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −12.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 38.7% | 46.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 12.3% | – |
| Net margin | 10.8% | – |
| FCF margin | 25.4% (better) | 14.2% |
| Return on equity | 8.9% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 7.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.59 | 0.53 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.06 (better) | 2.33 |
| Interest coverage | 13.6× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.55 (better) | 2.09 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.72 (better) | 2.81 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.24% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | 4.0% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.0% (better) | 0.24% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 104% | 77.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.52% | 0.17% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$21.3M | −$645K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.4% | 2.1% |
Go deeper
- ON stock overview
- ON income statement
- ON valuation and score
- Q stock overview
- Q income statement
- Q valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.