Mid America Apartment Communities vs Sun Communities
MAA and SUI side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MAA and SUI compare
Mid America Apartment Communities and Sun Communities are about the same size, with market caps of $13.7B and $14.1B.
Sun Communities grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.4% versus 0.96% for Mid America Apartment Communities).
Mid America Apartment Communities keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.4% compared with −31.8% at Sun Communities.
Both pay dividends: Mid America Apartment Communities yields 5.2% and Sun Communities 3.7%.
Mid America Apartment Communities scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 5 for Sun Communities), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MAA | SUI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $13.7B | $14.1B |
| Share price | $117.89 | $118.52 |
| Change, 1 year | −10.3% | −6.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −41.4% | −39.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.66 | 0.60 |
| Employees | 2,507 | 3,614 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 35.7× | – |
| P/S | 6.1× | 5.9× (better) |
| P/B | 2.6× (better) | 2.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.8× | – |
| Fair value | $106.77 | $81.99 |
| Margin of safety | −10.4% (better) | −44.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.96% | 18.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.7% | 10.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −30.3% (better) | −173% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −30.1% (better) | −176% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.5% | 51.9% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 17.4% (better) | −31.8% |
| Return on equity | 7.0% (better) | −12.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 1.43 | 2.20 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.2% (better) | 3.7% |
| Payout ratio | 184% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 8 | 9 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 8.7% | 20.6% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 1.1% | 3.6% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 6.3% | 7.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.1% | 104% |
| Held by insiders | 0.66% | 1.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$823K (better) | −$27.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.1% | 6.1% |
Go deeper
- MAA stock overview
- MAA income statement
- MAA valuation and score
- SUI stock overview
- SUI income statement
- SUI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.