Lattice Semiconductor vs Silicon Laboratories
LSCC and SLAB side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LSCC and SLAB compare
Lattice Semiconductor is the larger company, worth 2.4 times as much as Silicon Laboratories ($17.4B against $7.4B).
Lattice Semiconductor grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (33.3% versus 21.3% for Silicon Laboratories).
Lattice Semiconductor keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.6% compared with −2.3% at Silicon Laboratories.
Lattice Semiconductor scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 7 for Silicon Laboratories), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LSCC | SLAB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $17.4B | $7.4B |
| Share price | $122.77 | $221.61 |
| Change, 1 year | 83.1% | 69.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 46.2% | 8.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.84 | 1.37 |
| Employees | 1,174 | 1,930 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 472× | – |
| P/S | 26.8× | 8.2× (better) |
| P/B | 22.1× | 6.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 360× | – |
| P/FCF | 87.6× (better) | 1042× |
| FCF yield | 1.1% (better) | 0.10% |
| Fair value | $11.01 | $133.52 |
| Margin of safety | −1015% | −66.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 33.3% (better) | 21.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.1% | 9.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 14.8% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 13.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −43.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 69.0% (better) | 61.3% |
| Operating margin | 7.4% (better) | −2.6% |
| Net margin | 5.6% (better) | −2.3% |
| FCF margin | 30.6% (better) | 0.79% |
| Return on equity | 4.9% (better) | −1.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 6.5% (better) | −2.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | – | −25.0× |
| Current ratio | 3.02 | 4.60 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 57.01 (better) | 23.14 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.20% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.20% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 93.2% |
| Held by insiders | 1.1% | 2.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$19.0M | −$4.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.9% | 5.2% |
Go deeper
- LSCC stock overview
- LSCC income statement
- LSCC valuation and score
- SLAB stock overview
- SLAB income statement
- SLAB valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.