Lattice Semiconductor vs MACOM Technology Solutions
LSCC and MTSI side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LSCC and MTSI compare
Lattice Semiconductor and MACOM Technology Solutions are about the same size, with market caps of $16.0B and $17.7B.
On earnings, MACOM Technology Solutions is cheaper: it trades at 53.8× trailing earnings, against 432× for Lattice Semiconductor.
MACOM Technology Solutions grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (37.3% versus 33.3% for Lattice Semiconductor).
MACOM Technology Solutions keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 25.3% compared with 5.6% at Lattice Semiconductor.
MACOM Technology Solutions scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 11 for Lattice Semiconductor), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LSCC | MTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $16.0B | $17.7B |
| Share price | $112.35 | $232.06 |
| Change, 1 year | 71.4% | 35.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 33.8% | 199% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.82 | 1.50 |
| Employees | 1,174 | 2,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 | 4 |
| Performance score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 432× | 53.8× (better) |
| P/S | 24.5× | 13.3× (better) |
| P/B | 20.3× | 10.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 329× | 46.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 80.2× | 60.6× (better) |
| PEG | – | 1.08 |
| FCF yield | 1.2% | 1.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $11.00 | $167.09 |
| Margin of safety | −922% | −38.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 33.3% | 37.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.1% | 16.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 14.8% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 13.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −43.3% | 51.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 69.0% (better) | 58.0% |
| Operating margin | 7.4% | 23.0% (better) |
| Net margin | 5.6% | 25.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 30.6% (better) | 22.0% |
| Return on equity | 4.9% | 22.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.5% | 23.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.20 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −1.23 |
| Current ratio | 3.02 (better) | 2.53 |
| Altman Z-score | 52.30 (better) | 18.46 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.22% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.22% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 95.9% |
| Held by insiders | 1.1% | 6.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$19.0M (better) | −$283M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.9% | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- LSCC stock overview
- LSCC income statement
- LSCC valuation and score
- MTSI stock overview
- MTSI income statement
- MTSI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.