Lattice Semiconductor vs Silicon Laboratories
LSCC and SLAB side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LSCC and SLAB compare
Lattice Semiconductor is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Silicon Laboratories ($13.2B against $7.4B).
Lattice Semiconductor grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (33.3% versus 21.7% for Silicon Laboratories).
Lattice Semiconductor keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.6% compared with −4.6% at Silicon Laboratories.
Lattice Semiconductor scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 4 for Silicon Laboratories), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LSCC | SLAB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $13.2B | $7.4B |
| Share price | $92.97 | $222.45 |
| Change, 1 year | 25.8% | 68.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 13.4% | 11.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.85 | 1.37 |
| Employees | 1,174 | 1,930 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 358× | – |
| P/S | 20.3× | 8.7× (better) |
| P/B | 16.8× | 6.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 272× | – |
| P/FCF | 66.4× | – |
| FCF yield | 1.5% (better) | −0.07% |
| Fair value | $10.99 | $129.32 |
| Margin of safety | −746% | −72.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 33.3% (better) | 21.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.1% | 9.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 14.8% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 13.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −43.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 69.0% (better) | 60.6% |
| Operating margin | 7.4% (better) | −5.1% |
| Net margin | 5.6% (better) | −4.6% |
| FCF margin | 30.6% (better) | −0.63% |
| Return on equity | 4.9% (better) | −3.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 6.5% (better) | −4.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −47.0× |
| Current ratio | 3.02 | 5.41 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 43.55 (better) | 30.25 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.27% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.27% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 93.2% |
| Held by insiders | 0.92% | 2.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$18.6M | −$4.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.7% | 7.8% |
Go deeper
- LSCC stock overview
- LSCC income statement
- LSCC valuation and score
- SLAB stock overview
- SLAB income statement
- SLAB valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.