Lattice Semiconductor vs Sitime
LSCC and SITM side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LSCC and SITM compare
Lattice Semiconductor is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Sitime ($17.4B against $14.2B).
On earnings, Lattice Semiconductor is cheaper: it trades at 472× trailing earnings, against 497× for Sitime.
Sitime grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (143% versus 33.3% for Lattice Semiconductor).
Lattice Semiconductor keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.6% compared with 3.9% at Sitime.
Lattice Semiconductor scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 10 for Sitime), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LSCC | SITM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $17.4B | $14.2B |
| Share price | $122.77 | $472.56 |
| Change, 1 year | 83.1% | 47.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 46.2% | 64.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.84 | 2.66 |
| Employees | 1,174 | 441 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 472× (better) | 497× |
| P/S | 26.8× | 20.8× (better) |
| P/B | 22.1× | 4.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 360× | 123× (better) |
| P/FCF | 87.6× (better) | 343× |
| FCF yield | 1.1% (better) | 0.29% |
| Fair value | $11.01 | $59.95 |
| Margin of safety | −1015% | −688% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 33.3% | 143% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.1% | 23.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 14.8% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 13.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −43.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 69.0% (better) | 56.2% |
| Operating margin | 7.4% (better) | 0.87% |
| Net margin | 5.6% (better) | 3.9% |
| FCF margin | 30.6% (better) | 6.1% |
| Return on equity | 4.9% (better) | 1.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 6.5% (better) | 0.28% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 3.02 | 5.56 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 57.01 (better) | 5.95 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.20% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.20% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 75.5% |
| Held by insiders | 1.1% | 26.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$19.0M (better) | −$395M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.9% | 7.3% |
Go deeper
- LSCC stock overview
- LSCC income statement
- LSCC valuation and score
- SITM stock overview
- SITM income statement
- SITM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.