Lattice Semiconductor vs MaxLinear
LSCC and MXL side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LSCC and MXL compare
Lattice Semiconductor is the larger company, worth 3.1 times as much as MaxLinear ($16.9B against $5.4B).
MaxLinear grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (56.0% versus 33.3% for Lattice Semiconductor).
Lattice Semiconductor keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.6% compared with −4.4% at MaxLinear.
Lattice Semiconductor scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 7 for MaxLinear), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LSCC | MXL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $16.9B | $5.4B |
| Share price | $118.85 | $58.96 |
| Change, 1 year | 79.9% | 298% |
| Change, 5 years | 41.6% | −16.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.84 | 2.09 |
| Employees | 1,174 | 1,115 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 457× | – |
| P/S | 25.9× | 8.1× (better) |
| P/B | 21.4× | 10.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 348× | 146× (better) |
| P/FCF | 84.8× | – |
| FCF yield | 1.2% (better) | −0.38% |
| Fair value | $11.00 | $8.93 |
| Margin of safety | −980% | −560% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 33.3% | 56.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.1% (better) | −0.46% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 14.8% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 13.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −43.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 69.0% (better) | 58.0% |
| Operating margin | 7.4% (better) | −0.92% |
| Net margin | 5.6% (better) | −4.4% |
| FCF margin | 30.6% (better) | −3.1% |
| Return on equity | 4.9% (better) | −5.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 6.5% (better) | −0.88% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.31 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.22 |
| Interest coverage | – | −0.6× |
| Current ratio | 3.02 (better) | 2.22 |
| Altman Z-score | 55.24 (better) | 8.59 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.21% (better) | −0.10% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.21% (better) | −0.10% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 82.0% |
| Held by insiders | 1.1% | 2.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$19.0M (better) | −$60.1M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.9% | 5.2% |
Go deeper
- LSCC stock overview
- LSCC income statement
- LSCC valuation and score
- MXL stock overview
- MXL income statement
- MXL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.