Harley-Davidson vs Modine Manufacturing
HOG and MOD side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HOG and MOD compare
Modine Manufacturing is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as Harley-Davidson ($5.5B against $3.5B).
Modine Manufacturing grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (35.1% versus −14.6% for Harley-Davidson).
Modine Manufacturing keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.6% compared with −3.3% at Harley-Davidson.
Harley-Davidson pays a dividend yielding 2.2%; Modine Manufacturing does not pay one.
Modine Manufacturing scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 9 for Harley-Davidson), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HOG | MOD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.5B | $5.5B |
| Share price | $33.96 | $103.07 |
| Change, 1 year | 34.5% | −34.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −9.2% | 769% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.09 | 1.73 |
| Employees | 6,400 | 13K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 43.3× |
| P/S | 0.9× (better) | 1.5× |
| P/B | 1.2× (better) | 4.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 13.5× |
| P/FCF | 11.3× | – |
| FCF yield | 8.8% (better) | −0.18% |
| Fair value | $48.98 | $72.57 |
| Margin of safety | 30.7% (better) | −42.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −14.6% | 35.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.0% | 12.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −126% | −30.3% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −125% | −31.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 208% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 31.5% (better) | 21.7% |
| Operating margin | −5.6% | 10.1% (better) |
| Net margin | −3.3% | 3.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 7.8% (better) | −0.27% |
| Return on equity | −4.0% | 11.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −3.5% | 13.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.77 | 0.59 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 1.28 |
| Interest coverage | −12.0× | 11.3× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.97 | 2.17 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.04 | 4.18 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.2% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 10.4% | – |
| Buyback yield | 9.9% (better) | 1.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 12.1% (better) | 1.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 99.3% |
| Held by insiders | 1.1% | 2.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.4M (better) | −$40.4M |
| Short interest, % of float | 19.2% | 4.7% |
Go deeper
- HOG stock overview
- HOG income statement
- HOG valuation and score
- MOD stock overview
- MOD income statement
- MOD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.