Federal Realty Investment Trust vs Macerich
FRT and MAC side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FRT and MAC compare
Federal Realty Investment Trust is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Macerich ($9.7B against $7.2B).
Federal Realty Investment Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.8% versus −1.3% for Macerich).
Federal Realty Investment Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 32.6% compared with −9.8% at Macerich.
Both pay dividends: Federal Realty Investment Trust yields 4.0% and Macerich 2.7%.
Federal Realty Investment Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 6 for Macerich), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FRT | MAC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $9.7B | $7.2B |
| Share price | $113.10 | $25.38 |
| Change, 1 year | 16.9% | 41.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −12.3% | 20.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.74 | 1.31 |
| Employees | 314 | 598 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 22.8× | – |
| P/S | 7.2× | 7.1× (better) |
| P/B | 3.0× | 2.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.3× | – |
| Fair value | $114.86 | $11.73 |
| Margin of safety | 1.5% (better) | −116% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.8% (better) | −1.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.9% (better) | 5.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 27.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 26.1% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 23.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 47.7% | – |
| Net margin | 32.6% (better) | −9.8% |
| Return on equity | 13.6% (better) | −3.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 16.4% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 3.3× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.43 (better) | 0.20 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.0% (better) | 2.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 13 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 1.0% (better) | −15.2% |
| Buyback yield | −0.62% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.4% (better) | 2.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.4% | 110% |
| Held by insiders | 0.94% | 0.38% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$163K | −$63.8K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.5% | 11.9% |
Go deeper
- FRT stock overview
- FRT income statement
- FRT valuation and score
- MAC stock overview
- MAC income statement
- MAC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.