EOG Resources vs Expand Energy
EOG and EXE side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EOG and EXE compare
EOG Resources is the larger company, worth 3.9 times as much as Expand Energy ($80.7B against $20.5B).
On earnings, Expand Energy is cheaper: it trades at 7.7× trailing earnings, against 9.9× for EOG Resources.
EOG Resources grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (31.7% versus 28.2% for Expand Energy).
EOG Resources keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 27.5% compared with 19.8% at Expand Energy.
Both pay dividends: EOG Resources yields 2.7% and Expand Energy 3.2%.
EOG Resources scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 16 for Expand Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EOG | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $80.7B | $20.5B |
| Share price | $153.77 | $88.63 |
| Change, 1 year | 44.3% | −22.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 79.5% | 43.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.55 | 0.60 |
| Employees | 3,400 | 1,600 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 16 |
| Valuation score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 9.9× | 7.7× (better) |
| P/S | 2.7× | 1.5× (better) |
| P/B | 2.4× | 1.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.3× | 3.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 7.9× |
| FCF yield | – | 12.7% |
| Fair value | $181.07 | $100.71 |
| Margin of safety | 15.1% (better) | 12.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 31.7% (better) | 28.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.5% | 18.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 48.0% | 218% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 53.9% | 228% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 35.8% (better) | 25.7% |
| Net margin | 27.5% (better) | 19.8% |
| FCF margin | – | 18.6% |
| Return on equity | 25.8% (better) | 14.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 23.8% (better) | 12.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.24 | 0.24 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.14 (better) | 0.69 |
| Interest coverage | 40.1× (better) | 17.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.90 (better) | 0.90 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.22 (better) | 2.32 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.7% | 3.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 19.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 21.6% | – |
| Buyback yield | 4.3% | 4.4% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 6.9% | 7.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.5% | 95.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.23% | 0.33% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$10.8M | $877K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.2% | 5.1% |
Go deeper
- EOG stock overview
- EOG income statement
- EOG valuation and score
- EXE stock overview
- EXE income statement
- EXE valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.