DT Midstream vs Kinetik
DTM and KNTK side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DTM and KNTK compare
DT Midstream is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Kinetik ($12.2B against $8.9B).
On earnings, Kinetik is cheaper: it trades at 17.1× trailing earnings, against 26.0× for DT Midstream.
Kinetik grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.8% versus 13.4% for DT Midstream).
DT Midstream keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 35.4% compared with 10.7% at Kinetik.
Both pay dividends: DT Midstream yields 2.9% and Kinetik 4.4%.
DT Midstream scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 9 for Kinetik), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DTM | KNTK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $12.2B | $8.9B |
| Share price | $119.73 | $54.88 |
| Change, 1 year | 3.8% | 62.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 154% | 72.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.55 | 0.62 |
| Employees | 588 | 500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 26.0× | 17.1× (better) |
| P/S | 9.2× | 4.5× (better) |
| P/B | 2.5× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.5× (better) | 19.7× |
| P/FCF | 22.9× (better) | 33.7× |
| PEG | 6.32 | 0.80 (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.4% (better) | 3.0% |
| Fair value | $85.20 | $38.54 |
| Margin of safety | −40.5% (better) | −42.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.4% | 15.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.5% | 33.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 16.9% | 426% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 16.2% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 5.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 54.9% |
| Operating margin | 49.4% (better) | 12.2% |
| Net margin | 35.4% (better) | 10.7% |
| FCF margin | 40.0% (better) | 13.3% |
| Return on equity | 9.9% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 6.2% | 9.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.68 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.26 (better) | 6.01 |
| Interest coverage | 4.0× (better) | 1.1× |
| Current ratio | 1.16 (better) | 0.64 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.83 (better) | 1.22 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.9% | 4.4% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 73.2% | 106% |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.9% | 4.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 87.6% | 44.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.57% | 13.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$6.2K (better) | −$451M |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.6% | 4.8% |
Go deeper
- DTM stock overview
- DTM income statement
- DTM valuation and score
- KNTK stock overview
- KNTK income statement
- KNTK valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.