Antero Midstream vs DT Midstream
AM and DTM side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AM and DTM compare
DT Midstream is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Antero Midstream ($12.1B against $9.5B).
On earnings, Antero Midstream is cheaper: it trades at 14.1× trailing earnings, against 25.9× for DT Midstream.
DT Midstream grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.4% versus 7.3% for Antero Midstream).
Both pay dividends: Antero Midstream yields 3.4% and DT Midstream 2.9%.
DT Midstream scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 7 for Antero Midstream), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AM | DTM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $9.5B | $12.1B |
| Share price | $20.02 | $119.00 |
| Change, 1 year | 12.2% | 3.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 97.0% | 153% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.58 | 0.55 |
| Employees | 632 | 588 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.1× (better) | 25.9× |
| P/S | 7.5× (better) | 9.1× |
| P/B | 4.3× | 2.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.3× (better) | 16.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 22.8× |
| PEG | 1.73 (better) | 6.29 |
| FCF yield | – | 4.4% |
| Fair value | $23.15 | $85.15 |
| Margin of safety | 13.5% (better) | −39.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.3% | 13.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.7% | 10.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 16.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 44.9% (better) | 16.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 5.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 81.3% (better) | 49.4% |
| Net margin | – | 35.4% |
| FCF margin | – | 40.0% |
| Return on equity | – | 9.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 14.5% (better) | 6.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.42 | 0.68 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.07 (better) | 3.26 |
| Interest coverage | – | 4.0× |
| Current ratio | 0.84 | 1.16 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.19 (better) | 1.83 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.4% (better) | 2.9% |
| Payout ratio | – | 73.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 4 |
| Buyback yield | 1.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.4% (better) | 2.9% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 60.4% | 87.6% |
| Held by insiders | 1.5% | 0.57% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.3M | −$6.2K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.2% | 7.6% |
Go deeper
- AM stock overview
- AM income statement
- AM valuation and score
- DTM stock overview
- DTM income statement
- DTM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.