DraftKings vs Vail Resorts
DKNG and MTN side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DKNG and MTN compare
DraftKings is the larger company, worth 3.1 times as much as Vail Resorts ($16.8B against $5.4B).
DraftKings grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.4% versus −4.3% for Vail Resorts).
Vail Resorts keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.2% compared with −5.9% at DraftKings.
Vail Resorts pays a dividend yielding 5.8%; DraftKings does not pay one.
Vail Resorts scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for DraftKings), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DKNG | MTN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $16.8B | $5.4B |
| Share price | $18.89 | $152.61 |
| Change, 1 year | −40.1% | 1.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −47.7% | −55.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.16 | 0.81 |
| Employees | 5,500 | 40K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 37.0× |
| P/S | 2.6× | 1.9× (better) |
| P/B | 93.5× | 22.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 11.9× |
| P/FCF | 51.8× | 21.9× (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.9% | 4.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $2.33 | $140.74 |
| Margin of safety | −712% | −8.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 17.4% (better) | −4.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 58.0% (better) | 8.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −47.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −45.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 5.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 40.5% | – |
| Operating margin | −6.3% | 14.8% (better) |
| Net margin | −5.9% | 5.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.1% | 8.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | −83.1% | 44.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 10.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 13.25 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 4.02 |
| Interest coverage | – | 2.0× |
| Current ratio | 0.99 (better) | 0.80 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.26 | 1.51 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 5.8% |
| Payout ratio | – | 215% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | 2.5% (better) | 0.83% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.5% | 6.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 45.9% | 130% |
| Held by insiders | 1.5% | 11.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$16.3M | $5.0M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.9% | 20.2% |
Go deeper
- DKNG stock overview
- DKNG income statement
- DKNG valuation and score
- MTN stock overview
- MTN income statement
- MTN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.