Walt Disney vs DraftKings
DIS and DKNG side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DIS and DKNG compare
Walt Disney is the larger company, worth 12 times as much as DraftKings ($205B against $16.8B).
DraftKings grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.4% versus 4.6% for Walt Disney).
Walt Disney keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.7% compared with −5.9% at DraftKings.
Walt Disney pays a dividend yielding 1.3%; DraftKings does not pay one.
Walt Disney scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 8 for DraftKings), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DIS | DKNG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $205B | $16.8B |
| Share price | $118.97 | $18.89 |
| Change, 1 year | 2.0% | −40.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −22.7% | −47.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.06 | 2.16 |
| Employees | 231K | 5,500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 24.5× | – |
| P/S | 2.1× (better) | 2.6× |
| P/B | 1.9× (better) | 93.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.6× | – |
| P/FCF | 24.8× (better) | 51.8× |
| PEG | 0.42 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.0% (better) | 1.9% |
| Fair value | $147.56 | $2.33 |
| Margin of safety | 19.4% (better) | −712% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.6% | 17.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.6% | 58.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −25.5% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −24.0% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 40.5% |
| Operating margin | 18.4% (better) | −6.3% |
| Net margin | 8.7% (better) | −5.9% |
| FCF margin | 8.4% (better) | 5.1% |
| Return on equity | 7.8% (better) | −83.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 8.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.42 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.72 | – |
| Current ratio | 0.71 | 0.99 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.56 (better) | 1.26 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.3% | – |
| Buyback yield | 4.0% (better) | 2.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.3% (better) | 2.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 76.8% | 45.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.05% | 1.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$4.3M (better) | −$16.3M |
| Superinvestors holding | 9 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.2% | 4.9% |
Go deeper
- DIS stock overview
- DIS income statement
- DIS valuation and score
- DKNG stock overview
- DKNG income statement
- DKNG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.