Delek US vs PBF Energy
DK and PBF side by side, both in petroleum refining. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DK and PBF compare
PBF Energy is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as Delek US ($8.5B against $4.1B).
On earnings, PBF Energy is cheaper: it trades at 3.1× trailing earnings, against 3.6× for Delek US.
PBF Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (31.5% versus 27.1% for Delek US).
Delek US keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.7% compared with 7.0% at PBF Energy.
Both pay dividends: Delek US yields 1.1% and PBF Energy 1.6%.
PBF Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 14 for Delek US), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DK | PBF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.1B | $8.5B |
| Share price | $67.16 | $69.73 |
| Change, 1 year | 61.8% | 75.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 334% | 446% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.51 | 0.38 |
| Employees | 1,902 | 3,678 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 3.6× | 3.1× (better) |
| P/S | 0.3× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | – | 1.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.9× | 2.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 3.4× | 3.2× (better) |
| FCF yield | 29.2% | 31.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $240.46 | $171.39 |
| Margin of safety | 72.1% (better) | 59.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 27.1% | 31.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.0% | 14.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 15.0% (better) | 8.9% |
| Operating margin | 13.3% (better) | 9.8% |
| Net margin | 8.7% (better) | 7.0% |
| FCF margin | 8.9% (better) | 6.8% |
| Return on equity | – | 41.1% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 39.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.27 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.92 (better) | −0.11 |
| Interest coverage | – | 25.0× |
| Current ratio | 1.33 | 1.59 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.90 | 4.21 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.1% | 1.6% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 5.3% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 1.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.1% | 1.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 86.4% |
| Held by insiders | 2.4% | 27.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$46.5M (better) | −$1.0B |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.5% | 12.6% |
Go deeper
- DK stock overview
- DK income statement
- DK valuation and score
- PBF stock overview
- PBF income statement
- PBF valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.