Delek US vs PBF Energy
DK and PBF side by side, both in petroleum refining. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DK and PBF compare
PBF Energy is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as Delek US ($9.2B against $4.5B).
On earnings, PBF Energy is cheaper: it trades at 3.5× trailing earnings, against 20.4× for Delek US.
PBF Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (31.5% versus 11.4% for Delek US).
PBF Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.0% compared with 1.9% at Delek US.
Both pay dividends: Delek US yields 1.4% and PBF Energy 1.4%.
PBF Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 8 for Delek US), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DK | PBF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.5B | $9.2B |
| Share price | $73.57 | $78.00 |
| Change, 1 year | 92.5% | 129% |
| Change, 5 years | 300% | 431% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.47 | 0.35 |
| Employees | 1,902 | 3,678 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.4× | 3.5× (better) |
| P/S | 0.4× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | – | 1.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.3× | 2.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 6.6× | 3.5× (better) |
| FCF yield | 15.1% | 28.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $73.53 | $233.11 |
| Margin of safety | −0.06% | 66.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.4% | 31.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.0% | 14.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 7.1% | 8.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 4.8% | 9.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.9% | 7.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.7% | 6.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 41.1% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 39.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.27 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.55 (better) | −0.11 |
| Interest coverage | – | 25.0× |
| Current ratio | 0.76 | 1.59 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.03 | 4.26 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.4% | 1.4% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 27.5% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 1.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.4% | 1.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 88.4% |
| Held by insiders | 2.4% | 27.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$51.4M (better) | −$994M |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.9% | 13.8% |
Go deeper
- DK stock overview
- DK income statement
- DK valuation and score
- PBF stock overview
- PBF income statement
- PBF valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.