Churchill Downs vs DraftKings
CHDN and DKNG side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CHDN and DKNG compare
DraftKings is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as Churchill Downs ($17.5B against $6.9B).
DraftKings grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.4% versus 4.2% for Churchill Downs).
Churchill Downs keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.1% compared with −5.9% at DraftKings.
Churchill Downs pays a dividend yielding 0.44%; DraftKings does not pay one.
Churchill Downs scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 8 for DraftKings), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CHDN | DKNG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.9B | $17.5B |
| Share price | $100.64 | $19.64 |
| Change, 1 year | 0.77% | −35.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −15.2% | −45.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.87 | 2.17 |
| Employees | 9,000 | 5,500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.6× | – |
| P/S | 2.3× (better) | 2.7× |
| P/B | 5.0× (better) | 97.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.4× | – |
| P/FCF | – | 53.9× |
| FCF yield | – | 1.9% |
| Fair value | $154.30 | $2.35 |
| Margin of safety | 34.8% (better) | −734% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.2% | 17.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 22.7% | 58.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 12.7% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 16.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 40.5% |
| Operating margin | 25.5% (better) | −6.3% |
| Net margin | 15.1% (better) | −5.9% |
| FCF margin | – | 5.1% |
| Return on equity | 37.7% (better) | −83.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 9.3% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 3.42 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.55 | – |
| Interest coverage | 2.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.32 | 0.99 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.54 (better) | 1.35 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.44% | – |
| Payout ratio | 7.0% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 15 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 7.1% | – |
| Buyback yield | 1.1% | 2.4% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.5% | 2.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 87.4% | 45.9% |
| Held by insiders | 6.1% | 1.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$16.4M |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.4% | 4.9% |
Go deeper
- CHDN stock overview
- CHDN income statement
- CHDN valuation and score
- DKNG stock overview
- DKNG income statement
- DKNG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.