Constellation Energy vs Edison International
CEG and EIX side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CEG and EIX compare
Constellation Energy is the larger company, worth 4.2 times as much as Edison International ($97.3B against $23.1B).
On earnings, Edison International is cheaper: it trades at 6.4× trailing earnings, against 26.8× for Constellation Energy.
Constellation Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.0% versus 2.6% for Edison International).
Edison International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.6% compared with 11.1% at Constellation Energy.
Both pay dividends: Constellation Energy yields 0.61% and Edison International 5.9%.
Edison International scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 10 for Constellation Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CEG | EIX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $97.3B | $23.1B |
| Share price | $274.73 | $59.92 |
| Change, 1 year | −23.9% | 4.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 663% | −7.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.22 | 0.48 |
| Employees | 15K | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 26.8× | 6.4× (better) |
| P/S | 3.1× | 1.2× (better) |
| P/B | 3.0× | 1.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.7× | 7.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 315× | – |
| PEG | – | 0.07 |
| FCF yield | 0.32% (better) | −0.57% |
| Fair value | $252.03 | $168.30 |
| Margin of safety | −9.0% | 64.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 26.0% (better) | 2.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% (better) | 7.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 15.2% | 23.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 6.9% | 22.9% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 42.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 14.7% | 31.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 11.1% | 19.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 0.99% (better) | −0.71% |
| Return on equity | 15.3% | 20.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 8.2% | 8.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.77 (better) | 2.33 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.90 (better) | 4.49 |
| Interest coverage | 5.9× (better) | 3.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.46 (better) | 0.77 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.54 (better) | 0.71 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | 5.9% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 15.9% | 36.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 5.5% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.18% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.61% | 6.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 81.3% | 93.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.28% | 0.20% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $418K (better) | −$749K |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.0% | 4.3% |
Go deeper
- CEG stock overview
- CEG income statement
- CEG valuation and score
- EIX stock overview
- EIX income statement
- EIX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.