Dominion Energy vs Edison International
D and EIX side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How D and EIX compare
Dominion Energy is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as Edison International ($59.9B against $23.1B).
On earnings, Edison International is cheaper: it trades at 6.4× trailing earnings, against 22.6× for Dominion Energy.
Dominion Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (21.5% versus 2.6% for Edison International).
Edison International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.6% compared with 14.0% at Dominion Energy.
Both pay dividends: Dominion Energy yields 3.9% and Edison International 5.9%.
Edison International scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 7 for Dominion Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | D | EIX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $59.9B | $23.1B |
| Share price | $68.06 | $59.92 |
| Change, 1 year | 11.8% | 4.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −8.3% | −7.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.32 | 0.48 |
| Employees | 15K | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 22.6× | 6.4× (better) |
| P/S | 3.1× | 1.2× (better) |
| P/B | 2.0× | 1.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.2× | 7.0× (better) |
| PEG | 0.60 | 0.07 (better) |
| FCF yield | – | −0.57% |
| Fair value | $62.96 | $168.30 |
| Margin of safety | −8.1% | 64.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 21.5% (better) | 2.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.1% | 7.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 4.8% | 23.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 2.0% | 22.9% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 42.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 22.5% | 31.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 14.0% | 19.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | −0.71% |
| Return on equity | 9.4% | 20.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 4.7% | 8.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.85 (better) | 2.33 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 7.85 | 4.49 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.2× |
| Current ratio | 0.88 (better) | 0.77 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.68 | 0.71 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.9% | 5.9% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 86.7% | 36.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −5.0% | 5.5% (better) |
| Buyback yield | −2.4% | 0.18% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.5% | 6.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 81.0% | 93.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.12% | 0.20% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$749K |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.8% | 4.3% |
Go deeper
- D stock overview
- D income statement
- D valuation and score
- EIX stock overview
- EIX income statement
- EIX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.