CBL & Associates Properties vs Regency Centers
CBL and REG side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CBL and REG compare
Regency Centers is the larger company, worth 8.5 times as much as CBL & Associates Properties ($14.0B against $1.6B).
Regency Centers grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.2% versus 7.9% for CBL & Associates Properties).
Regency Centers keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 34.4% compared with 25.7% at CBL & Associates Properties.
Both pay dividends: CBL & Associates Properties yields 4.0% and Regency Centers 4.0%.
Regency Centers scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 11 for CBL & Associates Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CBL | REG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.6B | $14.0B |
| Share price | $53.20 | $76.18 |
| Change, 1 year | 65.8% | 8.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 74.3% | 3.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.81 | 0.66 |
| Employees | 500 | 507 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 10.9× | – |
| P/S | 2.8× (better) | 8.6× |
| P/B | 3.9× | 2.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 8.8× |
| Fair value | $114.57 | $70.22 |
| Margin of safety | 53.6% (better) | −8.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.9% | 8.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 0.09% | 8.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 23.0% | 37.8% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 23.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 72.0% |
| Net margin | 25.7% | 34.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 39.7% (better) | 8.2% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 13.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 4.69 (better) | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.52 | 1.82 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.0% (better) | 4.0% |
| Payout ratio | 46.7% | 95.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 12 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 3.8% |
| Buyback yield | 0.93% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.0% (better) | 4.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 79.6% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 15.3% | 0.52% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$123M | −$39.9M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.7% | – |
Go deeper
- CBL stock overview
- CBL income statement
- CBL valuation and score
- REG stock overview
- REG income statement
- REG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.