Avnet vs Genuine Parts
AVT and GPC side by side, both in wholesale trade-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AVT and GPC compare
Genuine Parts is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as Avnet ($17.0B against $6.9B).
On earnings, Avnet is cheaper: it trades at 12.6× trailing earnings, against 474× for Genuine Parts.
Avnet grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (44.3% versus 5.3% for Genuine Parts).
Avnet keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.7% compared with 0.12% at Genuine Parts.
Both pay dividends: Avnet yields 1.7% and Genuine Parts 3.4%.
Avnet scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 7 for Genuine Parts), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AVT | GPC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.9B | $17.0B |
| Share price | $83.97 | $123.34 |
| Change, 1 year | 78.0% | −3.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 116% | −8.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 0.71 |
| Employees | 15K | 65K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.6× (better) | 474× |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 0.7× |
| P/B | 1.3× (better) | 3.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.5× (better) | 37.9× |
| P/FCF | – | 22.3× |
| FCF yield | −15.3% | 4.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $89.90 | $47.54 |
| Margin of safety | 6.6% (better) | −159% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 44.3% (better) | 5.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.2% | 8.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 142% (better) | −96.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 150% (better) | −95.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 15.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 10.3% | 37.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.3% | – |
| Net margin | 1.7% (better) | 0.12% |
| FCF margin | −3.2% | 3.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.1% (better) | 0.66% |
| Return on invested capital | 9.3% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.79 (better) | 1.10 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.46 (better) | 7.71 |
| Interest coverage | 3.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.73 (better) | 1.22 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.00 (better) | 2.21 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.7% | 3.4% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 20.6% | 1861% |
| Years of dividend growth | 13 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 10.5% (better) | 5.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.7% | 3.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 108% | 94.6% |
| Held by insiders | 1.7% | 0.65% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$17.2M | −$668K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.0% | 4.7% |
Go deeper
- AVT stock overview
- AVT income statement
- AVT valuation and score
- GPC stock overview
- GPC income statement
- GPC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.