Genuine Parts vs WESCO International
GPC and WCC side by side, both in wholesale trade-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GPC and WCC compare
Genuine Parts and WESCO International are about the same size, with market caps of $16.9B and $15.9B.
On earnings, WESCO International is cheaper: it trades at 20.3× trailing earnings, against 472× for Genuine Parts.
WESCO International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.5% versus 5.3% for Genuine Parts).
WESCO International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.0% compared with 0.12% at Genuine Parts.
Both pay dividends: Genuine Parts yields 3.4% and WESCO International 0.60%.
WESCO International scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 7 for Genuine Parts), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GPC | WCC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $16.9B | $15.9B |
| Share price | $122.84 | $327.22 |
| Change, 1 year | −3.5% | 26.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −9.2% | 140% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.71 | 1.65 |
| Employees | 65K | 21K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 472× | 20.3× (better) |
| P/S | 0.7× | 0.6× (better) |
| P/B | 3.6× | 2.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 37.8× | 12.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 22.2× (better) | 38.3× |
| FCF yield | 4.5% (better) | 2.6% |
| Fair value | $47.95 | $266.02 |
| Margin of safety | −156% | −23.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.3% | 13.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.0% | 13.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −96.2% | 22.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −95.5% | 26.5% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 53.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 37.1% (better) | 21.5% |
| Operating margin | – | 5.6% |
| Net margin | 0.12% | 3.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.0% (better) | 1.6% |
| Return on equity | 0.66% | 15.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 10.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.10 (better) | 1.10 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 7.71 | 3.12 (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.22 | 2.01 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.21 | 3.18 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.4% (better) | 0.60% |
| Payout ratio | 1861% | 12.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 5.4% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.47% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.4% (better) | 1.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.6% | 96.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.65% | 2.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$668K (better) | −$62.6M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.7% | 2.0% |
Go deeper
- GPC stock overview
- GPC income statement
- GPC valuation and score
- WCC stock overview
- WCC income statement
- WCC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.