Avnet vs TE Connectivity
AVT and TEL side by side, both in wholesale trade-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AVT and TEL compare
TE Connectivity is the larger company, worth 9.1 times as much as Avnet ($62.6B against $6.9B).
On earnings, Avnet is cheaper: it trades at 12.6× trailing earnings, against 19.6× for TE Connectivity.
Avnet grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (44.3% versus 15.2% for TE Connectivity).
TE Connectivity keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.4% compared with 1.7% at Avnet.
Both pay dividends: Avnet yields 1.7% and TE Connectivity 1.0%.
TE Connectivity scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 10 for Avnet), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AVT | TEL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.9B | $62.6B |
| Share price | $83.97 | $216.34 |
| Change, 1 year | 78.0% | −12.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 116% | 30.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 1.22 |
| Employees | 15K | 104K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.6× (better) | 19.6× |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 3.1× |
| P/B | 1.3× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.5× (better) | 13.3× |
| P/FCF | – | 18.4× |
| PEG | – | 0.87 |
| FCF yield | −15.3% | 5.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $89.90 | $198.61 |
| Margin of safety | 6.6% (better) | −8.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 44.3% (better) | 15.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.2% (better) | 5.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 142% (better) | 76.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 150% (better) | 79.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 15.7% (better) | 10.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 10.3% | 36.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.3% | 20.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.7% | 16.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | −3.2% | 17.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.1% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 9.3% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.79 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.46 | 0.78 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 3.7× | 32.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.73 (better) | 1.73 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.00 | 5.12 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 9 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.7% (better) | 1.0% |
| Payout ratio | 20.6% | 26.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 13 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 10.5% (better) | 8.7% |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.7% | 4.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 108% | 95.1% |
| Held by insiders | 1.7% | 0.13% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$17.2M (better) | −$26.0M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.0% | 2.0% |
Go deeper
- AVT stock overview
- AVT income statement
- AVT valuation and score
- TEL stock overview
- TEL income statement
- TEL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.