Archrock vs DT Midstream
AROC and DTM side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AROC and DTM compare
DT Midstream is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as Archrock ($12.2B against $4.7B).
On earnings, Archrock is cheaper: it trades at 14.6× trailing earnings, against 26.0× for DT Midstream.
DT Midstream grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.4% versus 11.5% for Archrock).
DT Midstream keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 35.4% compared with 21.8% at Archrock.
Both pay dividends: Archrock yields 2.5% and DT Midstream 2.9%.
Archrock scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 11 for DT Midstream), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AROC | DTM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.7B | $12.2B |
| Share price | $27.09 | $119.61 |
| Change, 1 year | 10.0% | 4.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 257% | 154% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.78 | 0.56 |
| Employees | 1,350 | 588 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.6× (better) | 26.0× |
| P/S | 3.2× (better) | 9.2× |
| P/B | 3.1× | 2.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.1× (better) | 16.5× |
| P/FCF | 16.3× (better) | 22.9× |
| PEG | 0.17 (better) | 6.32 |
| FCF yield | 6.1% (better) | 4.4% |
| Fair value | $35.80 | $85.14 |
| Margin of safety | 24.3% (better) | −40.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.5% | 13.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.2% (better) | 10.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 41.9% (better) | 16.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 40.2% (better) | 16.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 5.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 48.9% | – |
| Operating margin | – | 49.4% |
| Net margin | 21.8% | 35.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 19.4% | 40.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 22.2% (better) | 9.9% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 6.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.51 | 0.68 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.68 (better) | 3.26 |
| Interest coverage | – | 4.0× |
| Current ratio | 1.39 (better) | 1.16 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.66 | 1.83 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.5% | 2.9% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 46.4% | 73.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 6.6% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.96% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.4% (better) | 2.9% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 87.6% |
| Held by insiders | 2.7% | 0.57% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$12.2M | −$6.2K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.2% | 7.6% |
Go deeper
- AROC stock overview
- AROC income statement
- AROC valuation and score
- DTM stock overview
- DTM income statement
- DTM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.