Allegro MicroSystems vs MACOM Technology Solutions
ALGM and MTSI side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ALGM and MTSI compare
MACOM Technology Solutions is the larger company, worth 3.2 times as much as Allegro MicroSystems ($17.7B against $5.6B).
On earnings, MACOM Technology Solutions is cheaper: it trades at 53.8× trailing earnings, against 201× for Allegro MicroSystems.
MACOM Technology Solutions grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (37.3% versus 27.9% for Allegro MicroSystems).
MACOM Technology Solutions keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 25.3% compared with 3.1% at Allegro MicroSystems.
MACOM Technology Solutions scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 7 for Allegro MicroSystems), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ALGM | MTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.6B | $17.7B |
| Share price | $30.13 | $232.06 |
| Change, 1 year | 13.8% | 35.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −8.2% | 199% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.72 | 1.50 |
| Employees | 4,250 | 2,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 201× | 53.8× (better) |
| P/S | 5.6× (better) | 13.3× |
| P/B | 5.6× (better) | 10.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 39.5× (better) | 46.9× |
| P/FCF | 53.8× (better) | 60.6× |
| PEG | – | 1.08 |
| FCF yield | 1.9% (better) | 1.7% |
| Fair value | $14.16 | $167.09 |
| Margin of safety | −113% | −38.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 27.9% | 37.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.5% | 16.9% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 51.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 47.9% | 58.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 7.5% | 23.0% (better) |
| Net margin | 3.1% | 25.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 10.4% | 22.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 3.2% | 22.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 5.0% | 23.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.29 | 0.20 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.65 (better) | −1.23 |
| Interest coverage | 4.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 4.13 (better) | 2.53 |
| Altman Z-score | 8.80 | 18.46 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 79.5% | 95.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.90% | 6.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.2M (better) | −$283M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.7% | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- ALGM stock overview
- ALGM income statement
- ALGM valuation and score
- MTSI stock overview
- MTSI income statement
- MTSI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.