Acacia Research vs Texas Pacific Land
ACTG and TPL side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ACTG and TPL compare
Texas Pacific Land is the larger company, worth 50 times as much as Acacia Research ($20.1B against $406M).
Texas Pacific Land grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (25.3% versus −3.7% for Acacia Research).
Texas Pacific Land keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 60.7% compared with −6.5% at Acacia Research.
Texas Pacific Land pays a dividend yielding 0.80%; Acacia Research does not pay one.
Texas Pacific Land scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 5 for Acacia Research), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ACTG | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $406M | $20.1B |
| Share price | $4.16 | $291.91 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.6% | −13.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −22.1% | 111% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.79 | 0.68 |
| Employees | 986 | 114 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 34.3× |
| P/S | 1.5× (better) | 20.8× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 11.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.5× (better) | 24.5× |
| PEG | – | 12.35 |
| Fair value | $3.96 | $236.41 |
| Margin of safety | −5.1% (better) | −23.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.7% | 25.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 57.1% (better) | 21.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −469% | 23.3% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −460% | 23.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −31.7% | 22.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 23.2% | – |
| Operating margin | −6.0% | 75.5% (better) |
| Net margin | −6.5% | 60.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | −3.4% | 37.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −6.0% | 51.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.03 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −20.61 | – |
| Interest coverage | −2.2× | 201× (better) |
| Current ratio | 5.64 (better) | 5.41 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.58 | 68.29 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 9 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.80% |
| Payout ratio | – | 27.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 13.9% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.80% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 88.2% | 72.8% |
| Held by insiders | 63.9% | 30.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$458K (better) | −$2.3M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.5% | 8.8% |
Go deeper
- ACTG stock overview
- ACTG income statement
- ACTG valuation and score
- TPL stock overview
- TPL income statement
- TPL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.