Acacia Research vs Texas Pacific Land
ACTG and TPL side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ACTG and TPL compare
Texas Pacific Land is the larger company, worth 54 times as much as Acacia Research ($22.9B against $423M).
Texas Pacific Land grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.8% versus 12.3% for Acacia Research).
Texas Pacific Land keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 60.3% compared with −5.4% at Acacia Research.
Texas Pacific Land pays a dividend yielding 0.70%; Acacia Research does not pay one.
Texas Pacific Land scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 4 for Acacia Research), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ACTG | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $423M | $22.9B |
| Share price | $4.33 | $331.68 |
| Change, 1 year | 30.4% | 7.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −21.4% | 118% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.81 | 0.63 |
| Employees | 986 | 114 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 42.3× |
| P/S | 1.5× (better) | 25.5× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 13.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.5× (better) | 30.6× |
| PEG | – | 15.22 |
| Fair value | $4.01 | $219.17 |
| Margin of safety | −8.1% (better) | −51.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.3% | 20.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 57.1% (better) | 21.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 17.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 17.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −31.7% | 22.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 22.2% | – |
| Operating margin | −7.0% | 74.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −5.4% | 60.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | −2.8% | 36.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −6.9% | 49.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −2.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 4.76 (better) | 4.55 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.43 | 76.62 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 9 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.70% |
| Payout ratio | – | 29.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 13.9% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.04% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.74% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 88.2% | 72.8% |
| Held by insiders | 63.9% | 30.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$458K (better) | −$2.3M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.0% | 8.8% |
Go deeper
- ACTG stock overview
- ACTG income statement
- ACTG valuation and score
- TPL stock overview
- TPL income statement
- TPL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.