Ferrari N.V.
Close on Nov 3, 2026Market cap $97.03BP/E 41.5Yield –
Ferrari Net Income Attributable to Parent by Year
Net Income Attributable to Parent ($M, DB XBRL) ($M)
Ferrari Net Income Attributable to Parent: $1,597M in FY2025, up 4.9% from a year earlier. That is the highest of the 11 years on record here.
Where the FY2025 figure comes from
Source: Ferrari N.V. Form 20-F (filed 2026-02-19, DB XBRL) ↗
Reported in Postgres DB financial_values.
Annual history
Hover a value to see the sentence it was read from; calculated values show their formula
| Period | Ended | Net Income Attributable to Parent ($M, DB XBRL) ($M) | Year on year | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | Dec 31, 2025 | 1,597 | +4.9% | Ferrari N.V. Form 20-F (filed 2026-02-19, DB XBRL) ↗ |
| FY2024 | Dec 31, 2024 | 1,522 | +21.6% | Ferrari N.V. Form 20-F (filed 2025-02-21, DB XBRL) ↗ |
| FY2023 | Dec 31, 2023 | 1,252 | +34.2% | Ferrari N.V. Form 20-F (filed 2024-02-22, DB XBRL) ↗ |
| FY2022 | Dec 31, 2022 | 933 | +12.3% | Ferrari N.V. Form 20-F (filed 2023-02-24, DB XBRL) ↗ |
| FY2021 | Dec 31, 2021 | 831 | +36.7% | Ferrari N.V. Form 20-F (filed 2022-02-25, DB XBRL) ↗ |
| FY2020 | Dec 31, 2020 | 608 | -12.6% | Ferrari N.V. Form 20-F (filed 2021-02-26, DB XBRL) ↗ |
| FY2019 | Dec 31, 2019 | 696 | -11.3% | Ferrari N.V. Form 20-F (filed 2020-02-18, DB XBRL) ↗ |
| FY2018 | Dec 31, 2018 | 785 | +46.6% | Ferrari N.V. Form 20-F (filed 2019-02-26, DB XBRL) ↗ |
| FY2017 | Dec 31, 2017 | 535 | +34.3% | Ferrari N.V. Form 20-F (filed 2018-02-23, DB XBRL) ↗ |
| FY2016 | Dec 31, 2016 | 399 | +38.6% | Ferrari N.V. Form 20-F (filed 2018-02-23, DB XBRL) ↗ |
| FY2015 | Dec 31, 2015 | 288 | – | Ferrari N.V. Form 20-F (filed 2018-02-23, DB XBRL) ↗ |
Cite this data
StockData. (2026). Ferrari Net Income Attributable to Parent ($M), annual FY2015–FY2025 [Data set]. Compiled from Ferrari SEC filings and investor materials. https://stockdatahq.com/stocks/race/kpis/db-net-income-usd-m
See every metric in the Ferrari KPI table. Data updated Oct 31, 2026.
See a number that looks wrong?