Johnson & Johnson
Close on Nov 3, 2026Market cap $641.44BP/E 40.4Yield 1.93%
Johnson & Johnson Cardiovascular Franchise by Year
Cardiovascular (formerly Interventional Solutions) Franchise — International operational growth YoY (%) (%)
Johnson & Johnson Cardiovascular Franchise: 11.9% in FY2025, down 9.0 pts from a year earlier.
Where the FY2025 figure comes from
“|| Intl | 3,623 | 3,194 | 13.4 | 11.9 | 1.5”
Source: Form 8-K (a2025q4exhibit991.htm, filed 2026-01-21) ↗
Reported in Form 8-K EX-99.2 Segment Sales Schedule.
Annual history
Hover a value to see the sentence it was read from; calculated values show their formula
| Period | Ended | Cardiovascular (formerly Interventional Solutions) Franchise — International operational growth YoY (%) (%) | Year on year | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | Dec 28, 2025 | 11.9% | -9.0 pts | Form 8-K (a2025q4exhibit991.htm, filed 2026-01-21) ↗ |
| FY2024 | Dec 29, 2024 | 20.9% | -10.8 pts | Form 8-K (a2024q4exhibit991.htm, filed 2025-01-22) ↗ |
| FY2023 | Dec 31, 2023 | 31.7% | +21.8 pts | Form 8-K (a2023q4exhibit991.htm, filed 2024-01-23) ↗ |
| FY2022 | Jan 1, 2023 | 9.9% | -19.9 pts | Form 8-K (a2022q4exhibit991.htm, filed 2023-01-24) ↗ |
| FY2021 | Jan 2, 2022 | 29.8% | +27.8 pts | Form 8-K (a2021q4exhibit991.htm, filed 2022-01-25) ↗ |
| FY2020 | Jan 3, 2021 | 2.0% | -15.8 pts | Form 8-K (a2020q4exhibit991.htm, filed 2021-01-26) ↗ |
| FY2019 | Dec 29, 2019 | 17.8% | +1.3 pts | Form 8-K (a2019q4exhibit991.htm, filed 2020-01-22) ↗ |
| FY2018 | Dec 30, 2018 | 16.5% | +2.5 pts | Form 8-K (a2018q4exhibit9915.htm, filed 2019-01-22) ↗ |
| FY2017 | Dec 31, 2017 | 14.0% | – | Form 8-K (a8k2017q4exhibit9915.htm, filed 2018-01-23) ↗ |
Cite this data
StockData. (2026). Johnson & Johnson Cardiovascular Franchise (%), annual FY2017–FY2025 [Data set]. Compiled from Johnson & Johnson SEC filings and investor materials. https://stockdatahq.com/stocks/jnj/kpis/mt-cardiovascular-intl-ops-yoy
See every metric in the Johnson & Johnson KPI table. Data updated Oct 25, 2026.
See a number that looks wrong?