Barrick Mining Corp
BNYSEGold and Silver OresFiscal year ends December 31
Financials through Q2 FY2026, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026Last filing: 40-F on Feb 27, 2026Score 13/30
$37.05−0.92 (-2.42%)
Close on Nov 3, 2026Market cap $62.07BP/E 12.6Yield –
Barrick Mining Total Debt: $4,703M in FY2025, down 0.5% from a year earlier. That is the lowest of the 8 years on record here.
Latest, FY2025
4,703
Period ended Dec 31, 2025
Change on a year earlier
-0.5%
4,729 in FY2024
History
8 years
Since FY2018
Sources
7
Documents cited below
Where the FY2025 figure comes from
“|| Debt (current and long-term) | 4,726 | 4,703 | 0 % | 4,727 | 0 %”
Source: Barrick SEC 6-K/40-F (FY2026Q1 MD&A & Financial Statements) ↗
Annual history
Hover a value to see the sentence it was read from; calculated values show their formula
| Period | Ended | Total Debt ($M) ($M) | Year on year | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | Dec 31, 2025 | 4,703 | -0.5% | Barrick SEC 6-K/40-F (FY2026Q1 MD&A & Financial Statements) ↗ |
| FY2024 | Dec 31, 2024 | 4,729 | +0.1% | Barrick SEC 6-K/40-F (FY2025Q4 MD&A & Financial Statements) ↗ |
| FY2023 | Dec 31, 2023 | 4,726 | -1.2% | Barrick SEC 6-K/40-F (FY2025Q4 MD&A & Financial Statements) ↗ |
| FY2022 | Dec 31, 2022 | 4,782 | -7.1% | Barrick SEC 6-K/40-F (FY2024Q4 MD&A & Financial Statements) ↗ |
| FY2021 | Dec 31, 2021 | 5,150 | -0.1% | Barrick SEC 6-K/40-F (FY2023Q4 MD&A & Financial Statements) ↗ |
| FY2020 | Dec 31, 2020 | 5,155 | -6.9% | Barrick SEC 6-K/40-F (FY2022Q4 MD&A & Financial Statements) ↗ |
| FY2019 | Dec 31, 2019 | 5,536 | -3.5% | Barrick SEC 6-K/40-F (FY2021Q4 MD&A & Financial Statements) ↗ |
| FY2018 | Dec 31, 2018 | 5,738 | – | Barrick SEC 6-K/40-F (FY2020Q4 MD&A & Financial Statements) ↗ |
Cite this data
StockData. (2026). Barrick Mining Total Debt ($M), annual FY2018–FY2025 [Data set]. Compiled from Barrick Mining SEC filings and investor materials. https://stockdatahq.com/stocks/b/kpis/fin-debt-tot-m
See every metric in the Barrick Mining KPI table. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
See a number that looks wrong?