Tutor Perini vs Tetra Tech
TPC and TTEK side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TPC and TTEK compare
Tetra Tech is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Tutor Perini ($10.1B against $5.3B).
On earnings, Tetra Tech is cheaper: it trades at 23.8× trailing earnings, against 38.0× for Tutor Perini.
Tutor Perini grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (22.6% versus −7.6% for Tetra Tech).
Both pay dividends: Tutor Perini yields 0.27% and Tetra Tech 0.69%.
Tutor Perini scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 15 for Tetra Tech), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TPC | TTEK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.3B | $10.1B |
| Share price | $100.33 | $39.43 |
| Change, 1 year | 60.2% | 23.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 609% | 4.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.25 | 0.84 |
| Employees | 7,400 | 25K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 15 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 38.0× | 23.8× (better) |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 2.0× |
| P/B | 4.1× (better) | 5.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.7× (better) | 15.9× |
| P/FCF | 7.8× (better) | 18.4× |
| FCF yield | 12.8% (better) | 5.4% |
| Fair value | $65.34 | $41.05 |
| Margin of safety | −53.5% | 4.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 22.6% (better) | −7.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 0.83% | 12.7% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 108% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −6.6% | 8.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 11.8% | 18.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | 5.6% | 12.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.3% | – |
| FCF margin | 10.8% | 10.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.3% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 36.0% (better) | 18.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.31 (better) | 0.43 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.78 | 0.85 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 7.4× | 15.4× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.27 (better) | 1.18 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.26 | 4.70 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.27% | 0.69% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 10.2% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 11 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 14.0% |
| Buyback yield | – | 2.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.27% | 3.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 80.3% | 98.9% |
| Held by insiders | 10.6% | 5.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$216M | −$351K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.9% | 5.6% |
Go deeper
- TPC stock overview
- TPC income statement
- TPC valuation and score
- TTEK stock overview
- TTEK income statement
- TTEK valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.