Aecom vs Tetra Tech
ACM and TTEK side by side, both in engineering, accounting, research, management, and related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ACM and TTEK compare
Tetra Tech is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Aecom ($9.9B against $8.2B).
On earnings, Tetra Tech is cheaper: it trades at 23.3× trailing earnings, against 29.1× for Aecom.
Aecom grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−4.2% versus −7.6% for Tetra Tech).
Both pay dividends: Aecom yields 2.0% and Tetra Tech 0.71%.
Tetra Tech scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 10 for Aecom), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ACM | TTEK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.2B | $9.9B |
| Share price | $63.34 | $38.65 |
| Change, 1 year | −52.5% | 21.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −9.4% | 9.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.82 | 0.87 |
| Employees | 51K | 25K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 29.1× | 23.3× (better) |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 2.0× |
| P/B | 3.7× (better) | 5.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.1× (better) | 15.6× |
| P/FCF | 40.1× | 18.1× (better) |
| PEG | 1.18 | – |
| FCF yield | 2.5% | 5.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $67.98 | $41.81 |
| Margin of safety | 6.8% | 7.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −4.2% (better) | −7.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.0% | 12.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −53.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −52.5% | 108% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 8.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 5.7% | 18.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | 4.1% | 12.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.9% | – |
| FCF margin | 1.3% | 10.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 12.3% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 14.4% | 18.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.24 | 0.43 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.39 | 0.85 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 3.1× | 15.4× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.06 | 1.18 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.81 | 4.65 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.0% (better) | 0.71% |
| Payout ratio | 52.0% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 11 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 14.0% |
| Buyback yield | 7.9% (better) | 2.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 9.9% (better) | 3.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.9% | 98.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.66% | 5.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.5M | −$351K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.6% | 4.9% |
Go deeper
- ACM stock overview
- ACM income statement
- ACM valuation and score
- TTEK stock overview
- TTEK income statement
- TTEK valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.