T-Mobile US vs Vodafone Group Public
TMUS and VOD side by side, both in telephone communications. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TMUS and VOD compare
T-Mobile US grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.7% versus 8.0% for Vodafone Group Public).
T-Mobile US keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.5% compared with −0.98% at Vodafone Group Public.
T-Mobile US pays a dividend yielding 2.6%; Vodafone Group Public does not pay one.
T-Mobile US scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 3 for Vodafone Group Public), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TMUS | VOD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $168B | – |
| Share price | $156.44 | $15.88 |
| Change, 1 year | −27.2% | 33.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 27.5% | 4.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.51 | 0.49 |
| Employees | 75K | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 16.4× | – |
| P/S | 1.8× | – |
| P/B | 3.0× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.2× | – |
| P/FCF | 9.1× | – |
| PEG | 0.24 | – |
| FCF yield | 11.0% | – |
| Fair value | $195.44 | – |
| Margin of safety | 20.0% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.7% (better) | 8.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.2% (better) | −1.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −13.5% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −9.8% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 29.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 31.5% |
| Operating margin | 19.8% (better) | 7.0% |
| Net margin | 11.5% (better) | −0.98% |
| FCF margin | 20.0% | 23.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 18.0% (better) | −0.77% |
| Return on invested capital | 23.9% (better) | 1.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.11 (better) | 1.04 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.10 (better) | 2.85 |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.2× |
| Current ratio | 0.92 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.51 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.6% | – |
| Payout ratio | 41.1% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | – |
| Buyback yield | 7.2% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 9.8% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 43.6% | 0.80% |
| Held by insiders | – | 25.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$161M | – |
Go deeper
- TMUS stock overview
- TMUS income statement
- TMUS valuation and score
- VOD stock overview
- VOD income statement
- VOD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.