Third Coast Bancshares vs TFS Financial
TCBX and TFSL side by side, both in savings institutions. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TCBX and TFSL compare
TFS Financial is the larger company, worth 6.9 times as much as Third Coast Bancshares ($4.6B against $664M).
On earnings, Third Coast Bancshares is cheaper: it trades at 10.1× trailing earnings, against 45.6× for TFS Financial.
Third Coast Bancshares grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.4% versus 10.5% for TFS Financial).
Third Coast Bancshares keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 31.4% compared with 29.7% at TFS Financial.
TFS Financial pays a dividend yielding 7.1%; Third Coast Bancshares does not pay one.
Third Coast Bancshares scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 12 for TFS Financial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TCBX | TFSL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $664M | $4.6B |
| Share price | $39.89 | $16.43 |
| Change, 1 year | 8.8% | 22.5% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −18.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.57 | 0.59 |
| Employees | 412 | 958 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 10.1× (better) | 45.6× |
| P/S | 2.8× (better) | 13.4× |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 2.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 53.4× |
| PEG | 0.23 (better) | 6.37 |
| FCF yield | – | 1.9% |
| Fair value | $45.50 | $10.99 |
| Margin of safety | 12.3% (better) | −49.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 26.4% (better) | 10.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 24.2% (better) | 1.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 30.7% (better) | 22.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 23.1% | 24.1% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 14.7% (better) | 2.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 31.4% (better) | 29.7% |
| FCF margin | – | 25.1% |
| Return on equity | 12.7% (better) | 5.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 0.15 | 0.27 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 7.1% |
| Payout ratio | – | 58.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.36% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.19% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 7.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 60.3% | 13.7% |
| Held by insiders | 15.5% | 0.45% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$115K (better) | −$2.7M |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.8% | 3.4% |
Go deeper
- TCBX stock overview
- TCBX income statement
- TCBX valuation and score
- TFSL stock overview
- TFSL income statement
- TFSL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.