Sunbelt Rentals vs Upbound
SUNB and UPBD side by side, both in miscellaneous equipment rental and leasing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SUNB and UPBD compare
Sunbelt Rentals is the larger company, worth 28 times as much as Upbound ($34.3B against $1.2B).
On earnings, Upbound is cheaper: it trades at 13.4× trailing earnings, against 26.5× for Sunbelt Rentals.
Upbound grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.9% versus 3.4% for Sunbelt Rentals).
Sunbelt Rentals keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.9% compared with 1.9% at Upbound.
Both pay dividends: Sunbelt Rentals yields 1.3% and Upbound 7.5%.
Upbound scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 7 for Sunbelt Rentals), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SUNB | UPBD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $34.3B | $1.2B |
| Share price | $83.63 | $20.70 |
| Change, 1 year | 22.0% | −10.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −2.8% | −52.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.28 | 1.37 |
| Employees | 26K | 15K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 26.5× | 13.4× (better) |
| P/S | 3.1× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | 4.6× | 1.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.5× | 4.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 3.4× |
| PEG | – | 0.17 |
| FCF yield | – | 29.5% |
| Fair value | $70.73 | $29.19 |
| Margin of safety | −18.2% | 29.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.4% | 5.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 10.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −14.7% | −11.5% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −11.3% (better) | −13.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −19.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 38.5% | 49.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 19.6% (better) | 5.1% |
| Net margin | 11.9% (better) | 1.9% |
| FCF margin | – | 7.5% |
| Return on equity | 17.3% (better) | 12.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 13.5% | 27.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.15 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.90 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 2.2× |
| Current ratio | 0.94 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 2.50 | 2.56 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.3% | 7.5% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 35.0% | 100% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 7 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 5.7% |
| Buyback yield | 4.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.4% | 7.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 80.3% | 99.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.30% | 3.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$478K | −$53.0K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 8 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.3% | 16.0% |
Go deeper
- SUNB stock overview
- SUNB income statement
- SUNB valuation and score
- UPBD stock overview
- UPBD income statement
- UPBD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.