StockData

Stagwell vs WPP

STGW and WPP side by side, both in business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How STGW and WPP compare

Stagwell grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.7% versus −8.1% for WPP).

Stagwell keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.31% compared with −1.6% at WPP.

Stagwell scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 2 for WPP), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricSTGWWPP
Size and price
Market cap$2.8B–
Share price$11.27$27.79
Change, 1 year118%42.6%
Change, 5 years37.1%−62.3%
Beta (5Y)1.220.97
Employees11K99K
StockData Score
Total score5 (better)2
Valuation score00
Growth score2 (better)0
Performance score22
Health score1 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E282×–
P/S0.9×–
P/B4.0×–
EV/EBITDA13.4×–
P/FCF7.6×–
FCF yield13.2%–
Fair value$6.07–
Margin of safety−85.6%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)7.7% (better)−8.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average26.8% (better)2.5%
Net income growth (TTM)−50.8% (better)−140%
EPS growth (TTM)−33.3% (better)−140%
Profitability
Gross margin36.0% (better)15.8%
Operating margin4.0% (better)2.8%
Net margin0.31% (better)−1.6%
FCF margin11.8% (better)4.7%
Return on equity1.3% (better)−7.1%
Return on invested capital3.1%3.8% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity2.041.94 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA4.19 (better)5.87
Interest coverage–1.1×
Current ratio0.810.89 (better)
Altman Z-score1.25–
Piotroski F-score6–
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield4.3%–
Shareholder yield4.3%–
Ownership
Held by institutions42.5%2.3%
Held by insiders–0.06%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$13.6M–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.