SM Energy vs Woodside Energy
SM and WDS side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SM and WDS compare
SM Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (108% versus −1.5% for Woodside Energy).
Woodside Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.9% compared with 13.7% at SM Energy.
SM Energy pays a dividend yielding 2.6%; Woodside Energy does not pay one.
SM Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 6 for Woodside Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SM | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.8B | – |
| Share price | $32.73 | $21.08 |
| Change, 1 year | 78.7% | 20.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 8.4% | 35.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.99 | 0.70 |
| Employees | 1,241 | 4,667 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 7.9× | – |
| P/S | 1.1× | – |
| P/B | 1.0× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.5× | – |
| Fair value | $39.22 | – |
| Margin of safety | 16.6% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 108% (better) | −1.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 22.9% | 29.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 29.0% (better) | −23.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −34.7% | −24.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 74.2% (better) | 34.9% |
| Operating margin | 23.6% | 30.0% (better) |
| Net margin | 13.7% | 20.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 15.0% (better) | 7.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 20.5% (better) | 7.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.33 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.70 |
| Interest coverage | 4.2× | 13.0× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.57 | 1.59 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.27 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.6% | – |
| Payout ratio | 22.4% | 74.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 109% (better) | 24.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.6% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.7% | 1.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.90% | 0.03% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.6M | −$535K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.5% | – |
Go deeper
- SM stock overview
- SM income statement
- SM valuation and score
- WDS stock overview
- WDS income statement
- WDS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.