Sylvamo vs Suzano
SLVM and SUZ side by side, both in paper and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SLVM and SUZ compare
Suzano grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−6.8% versus −7.1% for Sylvamo).
Suzano keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.1% compared with 2.3% at Sylvamo.
Sylvamo pays a dividend yielding 5.6%; Suzano does not pay one.
Sylvamo scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 5 for Suzano), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SLVM | SUZ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.3B | – |
| Share price | $32.24 | $9.24 |
| Change, 1 year | −22.8% | 0.87% |
| Change, 5 years | 14.8% | 3.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.69 | 0.53 |
| Employees | 6,500 | 23K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.2× | – |
| P/S | 0.4× | – |
| P/B | 1.3× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.8× | – |
| PEG | 2.54 | – |
| FCF yield | −0.86% | – |
| Fair value | $50.15 | – |
| Margin of safety | 35.7% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −7.1% | −6.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.0% | 10.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −65.1% | 4.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −64.2% | 5.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −3.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 20.6% | 28.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | 5.3% | 21.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.3% | 17.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.33% | 26.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 7.9% | 17.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 5.7% | 8.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.93 (better) | 1.87 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.15 (better) | 3.52 |
| Interest coverage | 3.4× (better) | 1.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.47 | 3.38 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.10 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.6% | – |
| Payout ratio | 96.1% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | – |
| Buyback yield | 3.3% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 8.9% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.7% | 5.8% |
| Held by insiders | 17.6% | 50.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$801K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.8% | – |
Go deeper
- SLVM stock overview
- SLVM income statement
- SLVM valuation and score
- SUZ stock overview
- SUZ income statement
- SUZ valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.