Sirius XM vs Tencent Music Entertainment
SIRI and TME side by side, both in communications. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SIRI and TME compare
Tencent Music Entertainment grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.8% versus 0.51% for Sirius XM).
Tencent Music Entertainment keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 33.6% compared with 10.5% at Sirius XM.
Sirius XM pays a dividend yielding 3.7%; Tencent Music Entertainment does not pay one.
Sirius XM scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 12 for Tencent Music Entertainment), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SIRI | TME |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $9.8B | – |
| Share price | $29.01 | $8.41 |
| Change, 1 year | 37.7% | −63.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −54.7% | 7.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.06 | 1.05 |
| Employees | 5,119 | 100K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.9× | – |
| P/S | 1.1× | – |
| P/B | 0.8× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.9× | – |
| P/FCF | 6.2× | – |
| FCF yield | 16.2% | – |
| Fair value | $43.39 | – |
| Margin of safety | 33.1% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.51% | 15.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 1.3% | 2.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −9.4% | 66.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −14.1% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 45.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 52.9% (better) | 44.2% |
| Operating margin | 19.0% | 40.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 10.5% | 33.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 18.4% | 30.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 7.6% | 15.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 5.8% | 18.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.77 | 0.17 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.28 (better) | −0.72 |
| Interest coverage | 3.7× | 104× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.32 | 1.74 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.42 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.7% | – |
| Payout ratio | – | 17.9% |
| Buyback yield | 1.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.8% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 85.5% | 13.7% |
| Held by insiders | 7.9% | 58.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.3M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.1% | – |
Go deeper
- SIRI stock overview
- SIRI income statement
- SIRI valuation and score
- TME stock overview
- TME income statement
- TME valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.